Electronic discovery has become a common issue for most litigation matters. If it is not handled with caution or restraint, it can be financially prohibitive or crippling. This paper aims to answer the question of who should bear the costs of retrieving and reviewing electronic documents, if an expansive discovery is insisted by the opposing parties.
See my article, "E-Discovery: Should the Discovery Costs Be Shifted to the Requesting Party?", published at The Advocates' Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 419-436.
Follow this link for the article:
http://www.bennettjones.com/Images/Guides/update3301.pdf
Saturday, December 15, 2007
Friday, June 1, 2007
Bank's duty of care to the beneficiaries of freezing orders
June 1, 2007 - Huang, Rebecca, "The House of Lords Concludes that Bank Owes No Duty of Care to the Beneficiary of Freezing Orders: Custom and Excise Commissioners v. Barclays Bank plc", Banking & Finance Law Review, Vol. 22 No. 3
http://www.bennettjones.com/Images/Guides/update3025.pdf
http://www.bennettjones.com/Images/Guides/update3025.pdf
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
